The Battle for Patents: A Call for Caution and Innovation, 1945-02-17
Scope and Contents
The document discusses the issue of compulsory licensing of patents in the United States. The Anderson Company opposes compulsory licensing, arguing that it would stifle innovation and competition. The Murphy Elevator Company, on the other hand, supports compulsory licensing as a way to stimulate research and industry. The Anderson Company believes that their success and innovations would not have been possible under a compulsory licensing system. The debate highlights differing perspectives on the role of patents in incentivizing innovation.
Dates
- Creation: 1945-02-17
Creator
- From the Collection: Schwabe, George Blaine, U.S. House of Representatives from Oklahoma's 1st district (1951-1952); 8th Speaker of the Oklahoma House of Representatives (1921-1923); Member of the Oklahoma House of Representatives from Nowata County (1919-1923), 1886-1952 (Person)
Language of Materials
English
Access Restriction
This series is stored off-site and requires prior notice to access. If you wish to view these materials, please contact the Congressional Archives staff to arrange an appointment.
Full Extent
16 Pages
Abstract
79th (1945-1947)
Repository Details
Part of the Carl Albert Center Congressional and Political Collections Repository